breakfastattiffanys

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) IMDB rating: 8.10 Plot: Butch and Sundance are the two leaders of the Hole-in-the-Wall Gang. Butch is all ideas, Sundance is all action and skill. The west is becoming civilized and when Butch and Sundance rob a train once too often, a special posse begins trailing them no matter where they run. Over rock, through towns, across rivers, the group is always just behind them. When they finally escape through sheer luck, Butch has another idea, “Let’s go to Bolivia”. Based on the exploits of the historical characters.

Actors: Newman Paul,Redford Robert,Martin Strother,Jones Henry,Corey Jeff,Furth George,Cassidy Ted,Mars Kenneth,Rhodes Donnelly,Scott Timothy,Keefer Don,Dierkop Charles,Adventure,Biography,Crime,Western,

What are some examples of the theme of anti-establishment in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance kid?
I already have that this movie goes against the old west and that criminals are the protagonist. Are there some other themes in this movie that show anti-establishment

---

its a different movie not like other movies..
its unique
John R0xxxx

Dust Devil (1992) IMDB rating: 6.40 Plot: A shape shifter (Burke) comes from the desert in search of victims, a spirit the locals call “The Dust Devil”. He prays on the lonely and the unloved, those that have already lost everything but life itself. Wendy (Field) has broken up with her husband and wanders aimlessly in her car. She picks up a stranger and begins having misgivings about picking him up when strange things begin to occur. Meanwhile a local police officer (Mokae) tracks the killer. Aided by a shaman’s admonishments about witchcraft he sets off to try and stop the beast before it can complete its grisly task.

Actors: Burke Robert John,Mokae Zakes,Matshikiza John,Swart Rufus,Hootkins William,Copley Russell,Odendaal Andre,Cornell Luke,Henn Philip,Stevenson Robert,Hallr Peter,Earnhart Stephen,Horror,Mystery,Thriller,Western,

The Bruce Springsteen song that says " dust devil in the freezer" do you know the name of it?
Not exactly sure that’s the lyrics but do you know it?

---

tenth avenue freeze-out
Epic Fail | Jan 30, 2010

---

devils and dust? that line isn’t in it but it’s the best i could come up with unless you’re talking about tenth avenue freeze-out and you just heard it wrong.
Jessie | Jan 30, 2010

---

Apparently it is Tenth Avenue Freeze Out. The link below suggest that quite a few people have heard something similar to what you did in that line. I can’t understand that myself – it has always sounded exactly like what it really is to me.
A M Frantz | Jan 30, 2010

Lucky Country (2009) IMDB rating: 5.00 Plot: 1902….the Australian Federation is a year old. Twelve year-old Tom’s beloved father, Nat, has dragged him and his sister, Sarah, to an isolated farm at the edge of the woods. But Nat’s dream of living off the land has died and he is losing his grip on sanity. When three ex-soldiers arrive at their cabin one night Tom, like his father, believes they are providence. But their presence becomes more menacing when one of them reveals a secret: he’s found gold. As the lure of gold infects everyone around him the cabin becomes a psychological battleground in which Tom’s loyalty is put to the ultimate test.

Online Movies World

Actors: Young Aden,Wallace Toby,Miller Pip,Pigot Neil,Farren Eamon,Menzies Robert,Bakaitis Helmut,Thriller,Western,

Is there such a thing as "male privilege" on GWS or on most Internet forums?
Inspired by this question
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt=Ak1EPZBclW85rmZtBs.h4azsy6IX;_ylv=3 ?qid=20100130064737AAisrTy&show=7#pr ofile-info-KfCJDp0Laa

I could name quite a few forms of "privilege" most of us enjoy here:

Having access to computers and the Internet, having had the opportunity to learn English and knowing that through that language we have a good chance of being heard even by people in other countries whose languages we may not feel any need to learn, having access to educations that made us at least semi-literate, having the free time to participate in these forums… we’re a lucky bunch come to think of it.

But none of these privileges seems to have anything to do with sex. At least not in the countries from which most of us log in. And as is well known, people can easily pretend (successfully or not) to be one sex or the other.

So does male privilege really play a role here?

Since people dispute the sex of various posters, it seems implausible to me that their actually being men could be conferring them any privilege in the exchanges.

---

It’s a open forum and anyone can answer and pretend to be whatever they want. The internet is anonymous and no one can trace the posters unless they were superhuman computer hackers. Our privilege is using a computer as many people don’t get access to a computer in this world. I agree with you that the gender of a poster is irrelevant to privilege.

Blue B | Jan 30, 2010

---

nah

only a DELUSIONAL FEMINISTS would think that
Kunzy D | Jan 30, 2010

---

No, but there is female privilege in here, in that women and feminists can have men’s answers and question deleted and their accounts banned for not towing the party line; Y!A is heavily biased towards women, so they are the ones that have privilege, much as in almost every other aspect of Western life.

The best part of the question you provided a link to was that the feminist poster, being what is viewed as a stereotypical feminist, spewed lots of hate from her privileged position, resorted to shaming tactics, and that smug undeserved attitude of superiority, and ironically asking a question and making comments that negate the original premise of her question by exemplifying the very "male-only" attitude she was attempting to deride.

Even better, from what she said, she is not coming back to the GWS section of Y!A, and will probably just stick to the sounding board of feministing.com. We should at least appreciate the one highlight of her otherwise contemptible behavior.
Milktoast | Jan 30, 2010

---

Sorry, I can’t see any ‘privilege’ – everyone has the opportunity to have their say, and contribute to the general core of knowledge and mutual understanding.

If you’re thinking of guys masquerading as gels, and making outlandish comments, like that they deliberately, in the role of female teachers, persecute boys in the class room, then I think they are pretty quickly caught out. So privilege doesn’t exist in that sense.

Of course, it would help if everyone was just honest about their point of view and their sex, etc (that last so we can ‘profile’ their answer when we read it – we’re only human).

As far as ‘mansplaining’ goes, its use is a derogatory, sexist and elitist act against men, it is, once again, a generalisation, and does not represent the facts, which are that women do the same thing just as often. The phrase ‘taking up an unassailable position on the bleedingly obvious’ comes to mind – it’s common to both sexes.

Now what does ‘womansplaining’ mean?
The Grappler | Jan 30, 2010

Pale Rider (1985) IMDB rating: 7.00 Plot: Clint Eastwood is a mysterious preacher who comes to a gold mining camp near a small town in the mountains. The miners are in grave danger as a ruthless landowner decides to take their land, with the support of the sheriff. The only one who seems brave enough to save them is this preacher who came from nowhere and nobody knows his past or his real name. Why is the sheriff afraid of him? Why is he such a good shooter? Is he really a preacher?

Actors: Eastwood Clint,Moriarty Michael,Penn Chris,Dysart Richard,Kiel Richard,McGrath Doug,Russell John,Hallahan Charles,McIntyre Marvin J.,Hamilton Richard,Paul Graham,Lafont Chuck,Action,Western,

It is finished: John 19:30 & James 1:15? Does it bring forth Death: rider on 4th night mare in Revelation?
References:
John 19:30 (KJV)
When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar,
he said, IT IS FINISHED: and he bowed his head,
and gave up the ghost.

James 1:15
…sin, when IT IS FINISHED, bringeth forth death.

Revelation 6:8
… pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death

If only the law imputes sin (Romans 5:13), and
by curse of law becomes sinners all (Rom 3… Gal 3), and
if inexcusable law even condemns sin imputer (Romans 2:1), and
penalty is Death (Romans 6:23), strengthened by law (1Cor 15:56);
Does law imputing sin bring forth Death mentioned in Revelation 6?

If so, should we then consider what’s first "finished" in John 17,
the work that the only true God gave JC to do: grace and truth;
and fact such work got finished before the cross, not at cross?
(especially if God will have mercy, and not sacrifice: Mt 9:13)

1st work "finished": John 17 vs 2nd "it is finished": John 19?
For in a (human) race, isn’t a work first "finished" called win?
And in a (horse) race, isn’t second "finished" called "place"?
Are we not also told: neither give "place" to the devil (the law);
Bcz law imputed sin, when "it is finished", brings forth Death?

---

How old is the universe when Adam is created?
Gen.1:26 to Gen.4:25, to Gen.5:3, is 130 years.
How old is the universe, Gen.1:1,2, and angels
Job 38:4-7,30-32, and space, when Cain kills
Abel, and Seth is born at year 130 of mankind?
Gen.5: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 28 gives age
130, 105, 90, 70, 65, 162, 65, 187, 182 = 1056
years to Noah son #10 is born.
Gen.7:6, Noah is age 600, at flood year 1656.
Gen.11:10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, to Terah,
at age 2, 35, 30, 34, 30, 32, 30, 29, 222 years,
age 205, Terah dies, Gen.11:32, year 2083, at
Abraham being age 75, Gen.12:4,7, to get the
covenant.
Exodus 6:3, 16-23,26; 7:7; 12:37,41, 430 years,
Moses and covenant heirs get the law that leads
to Christ Jesus, Gal.3:16-26. Year 2513.
Moses dies in 40 years, Deut.1:3; 34:7, yr 2553.
1Ki.6:1, 480 years, Solomon begans temple [ as
king David has been dead 4 years, Moses 480 ].
Solomon has 36 years, 1Ki.11:42, year 3069, &
997 BCE, now is 2009 CE, year 6075.
It is year 3460, 606 BCE and now 2009 CE, to
end of Judah kings, there will be no king until
Jesus at his 2nd coming [ Dan.12:1-12 [ 2x 1335
is 2670, and now is 2615 years ago, year 6075
goes to year 6130 for the 1000 year reign of
Christ Jesus and his first resurrected and God
alone knows the day and hour. I SAY GOD IS
RIGHT ON TIME WITH THE TIME HE GIVES.
Rev.17:6,10-14, Satan is down all of the 8th
that is of the 7, from year 3460, he will be down
in 2520 years, that was 95 years ago, Michael
is in the time of the end, Dan.12:1-9,10-13, so
Rev.12:3,4,6-11 [ WORD ], 12, WAS 95 YEARS
AGO.
KJV Bible 398 years, at 300 years is established
98 years ago, Satan down 95 years ago of 150
years, years 2520 to Dan.12:1-12 [ 2x 1335 = ]
2670, we are at 2615 years and 2009 CE, for the
1000 year reign to be more near each year.

jenn-1 | Nov 12, 2009

---

we believe in the bible brought by jesus(PBUH) but jesus never preached from john and lukes book sorry its not valid what you saying
FATIMA LOVE TO BE MUSLIM | Nov 12, 2009

---

Go and get laid.
101% PROUD hippie liberal | Nov 12, 2009

---

1Cor.14:34-35 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.

35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
corinthians | Nov 12, 2009

---

Yeah. Yeah. That makes a lot of nonsense.
TheGoldenGael | Nov 12, 2009

---

the bible is a fictional book written by wondering nomads thousands of years ago. why don’t you read the book instead of mindlessly following another’s suggestions. the fact the religion as we know it has brought about 90% of the world’s death and destruction since it’s inception is proof enough that we have not yet truly grasped God’s nature.
dontbejealous | Nov 12, 2009

---

Jesus said "it is finished". The work he had to do on earth was finished. The plan of salvation was finished.

As sure as we are born we must lay this body down in death. This old body cannot stand what is in store for us in heaven. We will get an immortal body that will stand for eternity.

Paul said we all run a race but we all receive the same trophy which is eternal life.
jusapobo | Nov 12, 2009

---

Death mentioned in St. John’s Revelations is not the same as the "death" that is being conveyed in Romans. One is a literal personification, the other is a metaphorical reference spiritual death, not physical. I think you have thought very long and hard about a rather pedantic and tangential point of the Bible.
Majik8ball | Nov 12, 2009

---

(John 5:36) But I have the witness greater than that of John, for the very works that my Father assigned me to accomplish, the works themselves that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father dispatched me.

(John 17:4) I have glorified you on the earth, having finished the work you have given me to do.

(John 19:30) When, now, he had received the sour wine, Jesus said:

Little Big Man (1970) IMDB rating: 7.70 Plot: Jack Crabb is about 100 years old as the film begins. A collector of oral histories asks him about his past. He recounts being captured and raised by indians, becoming a gunslinger, marrying an indian, watching her killed by General George Armstrong Custer, and becoming a scout for him at Little Big Horn.

Download

Available versions:

DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version

Actors: Hoffman Dustin,George Chief Dan,Balsam Martin,Mulligan Richard,Corey Jeff,Little Star Robert,Bellini Cal,Moreno Ruben,Shemayne Steve,Hickey William,Anderson James,Comedy,Drama,Western,Adventure,War,

Download Full Version>>

Do u think letting Cena defeat Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 would put him in the same league with other icons?
Like Hogan, Austin, and Rock? Or notable legends like Flair, Bret, Michaels, or Triple H?

http://www.wrestlinginc.com/news/wi/2009 /1118/462610/john-cena/index.shtml

With the rumors circulating everywhere and the possibility of Cena facing Taker at Wrestlemania 26 (source above), anything could happen. And logically, although I believe The Streak will never end, no one is fitter than Cena to end The Streak at the moment.

Some people have been saying that the honor should go to a young upcoming superstar who will be big in the future like John Morrison, CM Punk, Ted DiBiase Jr, Cody Rhodes, Evan Bourne, The Miz, Dolph Ziggler, or Kofi Kingston…but is it right to do so? How do you know the young upcoming superstar would last longer than Undertaker in WWE? A lot of fans believed Kennedy would be a future HOF-er and legend, but look where he is now. There’s no guara*damn*tee at all that the young upcoming superstar would be that great. Not to mention they got no credibility at the moment, and defeating Taker’s Streak will always overshadow every damn thing they did in their career. And I believe, no matter how people cheer for it, Ted DiBiase Jr isn’t nowhere near the class on ending The Streak after a match for ages.

What about giants? Taker faced many giants such as Giant Gonzales, King Kong Bundy, Big Boss Man, Big Show, A-Train, and Mark Henry, right? Yes, and those five matches also have one similarity, they are all bad boring matches that successfully lessened the credibility of The Streak. And since Vince seemed to stop putting giants against The Undertaker because of the big time failure against Mark Henry at Wrestlemania 22, I guess the chance for Kozlov, Jackson, Drew, Knox, and Sheamus are pretty much zero.

That leaves one last contender, the big names. Frankly speaking the big names which have fallen to The Streak would be Jimmy Snuka, Jake Roberts, Diesel/Nash, Sycho Sid, Kane, Triple H, Ric Flair, Randy Orton, Batista, Edge, and Shawn Michaels. In current WWE, only Jericho and Cena left to face him as the big names. But like Samoan Roots explained in one of his answers, regardless of his amazing skills, Jericho’s credibility to end The Streak is far lower than Shawn Michaels. Heck, maybe even lower than Edge!! Anyone who believes Jericho will end The Streak if he faces The Undertaker at WM 26 must be daydreaming. The match would be an epic, yes. But the anxiety? Slim to none.

A different story with John Cena. Cena’s wrestling skills isn’t half as good as Y2J’s, but who is the top star of the rosters? Who is the biggest name in the company? Who has never lost at singles title matches at Wrestlemania? Who consistently overcame the odds and came out victorious? Who is the face of the corporation? Who is the Icon of WWE? Who is Vince’s Poster Boy? There’s only one answer : JOHN CENA!!!

Over the years since becoming the Champ, Cena has been consistently built as the unstoppable superman. In his first year in SD!, he pawned Mysterio, Big Show, and Booker T. And during his first days in RAW, he owned Jericho, Christian, and Angle. Then he went on to defeat HHH, HBK, Edge, Umaga, Khali, Lashley, Orton, Sabu, and many other top challengers. Sure, he isn’t undefeated at Wrestlemania anymore, but he never lost in singles matches at Wrestlemania. Whenever anyone wants to get some, he’ll give them some. Practically, he has defeated almost every top stars in WWE but one, The Undertaker.

They had a match back at Vengeance which occurred in July 2003, back when Cena had only completed one year in the WWE and was still a mid-card heel in the white rapper gimmick, Cena has come a long way in those 6 years and I believe the WWE has purposely kept Cena and Undertaker apart from each other to save them for a huge main event which only seems Wrestlemania worthy in my opinion. Cena has been a Raw fixture the last 4 years with the Undertaker serving on Smackdown ever since late 2002, however they rarely have come into contact at any joint function involving the rosters. They got a little brawl at RAW’s family reunion in 2006 and Taker owned Cena last monday, leading many fans to believe these two would square off at the grandest stage of them all next year.

By putting Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania, WWE can hype the match like Andre vs Hogan at WM 3, with the high possibility of the face of WWE ending The Unbeaten Streak of a legendary giant. The icon versus the legend. The unstoppable force versus the immobile object. The Champ versus The Deadman.

Believe me, just by announcing this match WWE would get all the attentions from both younger and older generation fans. Just by hype only, WWE would make millions, let alone if something ‘controversial’ in the match (ending The Streak, I mean). Don’t believe in me? Look for yourself, one Tombstone and the rumor has been spreading all over the world!!

Vince is a good businessman, he knows if he really makes Taker vs Cena at WM official he would
make millions of money and gains tons of attention. Just by the announcement and hype only, WWE would have gotten billions of attention.

Either way, we still don’t know if the match will really happen at Wrestlemania 26 or not, but believe me. No disrespect to other great athletes in WWE, but the very second WWE officially announce the match, that very momenmoment, this match has already taken at least 80% of the hype, attention, hope, anxiety, and promo from the rest of the cards.

And hell yeah, Taker vs Cena at Wrestlemania is Andre vs Hogan in our time. Whether it’s Jericho or Cena, prepare yourself for a classic!

Answer my question above. Best response will get 10 points.

---

Taker vs Cena would be a great match for WM. But Cena beating Taker will NOT be a good idea. If you’re concerned about Cena not being up there with all those legends, believe me, HE IS!
undertakersymbiote | Nov 19, 2009

---

Cena is already an icon,just like Hogan,Austin and Rock,like him or not.He has sold lots of merchandise for his fans,has kept WWE going and has fought Triple H,Shawn Michaels,Chris Jericho,Edge,Batista,Rey Mysterio and Randy Orton – all big names.Thus I don’t see why Cena shouldn’t be facing Undertaker.

But Cena beating Taker is a no go.Taker is what he is mainly because of the Streak,and the Streak should be kept alive.Also Cena wouldn’t be in the same league as Bret Hart and HBK.
Captain Thinesh the ABU Killer | Nov 19, 2009

---

it wouldnt all it would do is take the undertakers biggest achievement taken away and piss the millions and the millions of the undertakers fan off
[ndc]new kid | Nov 19, 2009

---

I agree that Cena vs Undertaker would be a very good match, and a very big draw for Wrestlemania. However Cena gets enough crap he doesn’t deserve from fans at the moment anyway. I he were to end Undertakers streak, he would get more heat than Vickie Guerrero as WWE Champion.
ASK HIM | Nov 19, 2009

---

All i have to say is this…. If Cena ends the streak of the Undertaker.. I and thousands of the wwe fans in attendance and at home will RIOT and then stop watching
PWF Chairman | Nov 19, 2009

---

man oh man..that would be some real juicy stuff right there..could you imagine that..a 17 year legacy down the drain within an hour..cena would be legendary
Elle | Nov 19, 2009

---

I can appreciate that Cena is a very charismatic and popular wrestler, and does know his way around a ring quite well, but I would rather see a match starring Jimmy Wang Yang or Charlie Haas. I, like many people, do not particularly like Cena as a wrestler, given my general discontent for Powerhouse wrestlers, who have a rather repitive match pattern (Cena starts offense with punches, hits some powerslams, has opponent have a go, riles up and then hits the FU, or locks in the STFU). Really, if Cena broke Taker’s streak, I would probably turn away from that company forever.
Honestly, there are very few people who deserve to have the honour of breaking Takers streak. Chris Jericho is the only person in the WWE at present who I believe is the only person qualified to break it. Floating through over companies, Sting has the credentials, and, if he were alive, Mitsuharu Misawa would be a top candidate; But Cena- If that happened, my faith in Vince McMahon would be shattered.
And really, after I have endured Chavo jobbing to a midget, Brian Kendrick and Mr. Kennedy’s releases (upon internet-searching, I am annoyed that I didn’t see the latter wrestle as much), The Khali Kiss-Cam, Shelton Benjamin and Christian going nowhere, Jeff Hardy winning a world champion, while Jimmy Wang Yang hasn’t won a match since the Cruiserweight Championship became redundant, and Triple H inevitably breaking Ric Flair’s record, I am really getting sick of his shit.
ACC-R-Truth edition (YINPW) | Nov 19, 2009